Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
in Bridgepirt CT black thugss ride atv’s dirt bikes in city streets reckless not insured no license no reg. police will not pursue.gangs of them ride in large groups
This can’t be true…
Their court judges are really, really stupid. They have no brains!
Target practice.
Why do people believe these f**e posts. It’s amazing what ignorance is running rampant these days.
Oh my God! Police retire early or stay fit..be a lot of running around. .think you deal with I didn’t ; I wasn’t ; or no I did see anything! Good luck. Officers.
Run, get shot.
You really think that running from a cop gives a cop the right to shoot some one
These activist judges are drinking the progressive kook aid as far as obeying the law goes….so, if the run, after an obvious fatal crime, the Police have a right to shoot him down
Then I guess police have the right to shoot them