Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
You have to be kidding what is wrong with the judge
Pussys
So they are advocating chaos and lawlessness. Idiotic
This is unlawful. If one race runs, we all run. My suggestion….don’t break the law.
I guess that makes it legal to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back,,,,works for me
This entire justice system in this country needs to be overhauled including replacing every judge sitting. There is a mental disorder sitting on the bench. Maybe judgeships should only last five years.
What fucking liberals they all should be beaten and fired.
No one that commits a criminal act looses his right to avoid getting arrested!
Time for MA to clean house on their highest court. When the judges who interpret the law give special rules for a specific group it’s time to remove those judges. Making it legal for a black person to run from the police is a crime in itself and law enforcement should disregard this ruling.
Does the police have the right to shoot them as they run away.