Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
This country is going to$#%&!@*!!!!
If you’re innocent you have no need to run . This is the most ridiculous law I have ever heard of . Whoever thought this up had to be a libturd . Republicans don’t think that way . You run, you are guilty . End of story . It makes no sense to a logically thinking person .
Blacks always play the victim.
Hell, we all have “the right” to do as we see and if running from the cops is your thing, go for it. You might find that it is healther not to run but it is your “right”
Are they really that stupid???
like they dont already???
Liberal judges are out of control.
Once again, proof that you cannot cure stupid.
Good grief!!!
Running will get you shot! When the police try to stop you, it makes you look guilty when you run.