Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
What else would expect from a liberal dumbass state.
No, they don’t
f**e post
Hell a policeman or woman can hit a moving target, run.
It’s what atheist, socialist, snowflakes do.
Well, that will fix every thing..!
Kill them all let god sort them out !!!!!!
Civil war is on the horizon…
I recall a political cartoon in the Washington Post in the mid-60’s of a police officer confronting a felon. The officer’s hands were cuffed behind his back and the comment balloon had the officer saying, “if you’ll kindly drive my cruiser to the station, I’ll book you.” This ruling takes us beyond that.
How in the world did the Massachusetts Supreme Court jughes get appointed, with their bias? Why do they continue to hand cuff the police to prevent them from doing their job?