Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Something is in the water in MA
Stupid. The officer has the right to shoot a runner for not stopping!
If you actually read the whole article and the text of the court opinion, you’ll realize that it’s not as simple or inflammatory as the BS click-bait title of this article.
That being said, the court’s decision is bull c**p. No matter what your skin color is, you’re supposed to stop for a cop. Period.
Idiots !!!
Give me a break..so that means if I paint my face black..I can do the same..this guy was carrying an unregistered gun for crying out loud
What kind of judges do we have in Massachusetts that say black can run from the police, is that only blacks ? Can they shot the cops to? If this is f**e ?
Where did these judges come from?could it have been a mental ward?
Welcome to the country of WTF!!!!!
They have to pull their pants up first.
Another state not to visit!