Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Can police shoot them?????
That must mean all criminals can run. Wouldnt want to discriminste or show black privilage.
That’s alright because police dogs love fast food.
What has this Supreme Court been smoking???? Do they have their head up their butt?
Fk Supreme Court,when they defy the law,American people have the right to take law into own hands
Target practice!!!!!!!!
Making mockery of our police.
So what do we call them then , targets?
Police have right to shoot them in the back!
Ok. What’s next? They can rape steal murder and Rob. Then he cop comes and oh off on the run. Now what about a private citizen I see many citizen arrests in the future!
Of course they can run. Theu can get caught. They can try to disarm the officer. And they can get shot. By all means…run!