Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
First of all, the cop should not have to say freeze or halt or stop but one time, the second thing a thug would hear would be a bullet going through him.
They need a new court.
its also their right to get shot then
Guns stop runs
Now whites van sue the state for racism. They can’t run from Johnny law dog
SO WHITE PEOPLE RUNNING FROM POLICE GET SHOT IN THE BACK!
WHAT YOU WANT FROM THIS STUPID STATE!
And these fools still don’t know why Trump got elected.
I guess the judges there want criminals to stay on the street. Good luck living there, crime is certain to skyrocket.
They have the right to get shot also
Six year old children have more common sense than many of our judges.