In a recent survey conducted by FOX news, 61 percent of voters say they are unhappy with the direction of the country. “Unhappy” might be a mild way to put it, but it’s true. When Barack Obama entered office he had the highest approval rating of any President in modern politics. But after trying and failing and taking this country in a direction it did not want to go in, the only surprising revelation from this poll is that 38 percent of voters are largely satisfied with him.
Voters are also dissatisfied (to put it more accurately, the’re outraged) in almost every specific category of Obama’s Presidency. On economics, homeland security, illegal immigration and foreign policy, Barack Obama has consistently failed to live up to his obligations.
When Obama has made a decisive action on an issue, it has always been to satisfy his personal agenda. Almost as if he wanted to be President in order to authoritatively control this country as his own personal dictatorship.
Read more about FOX’s poll on page 2.
Obama’s America..shameful
I agree Obama has not done one single thing right ,to him everything that wrong is right.
_ look at him he is a failure the Post finally got it right complete failure but he is a damn good terrorist and good at committing treason let’s see how well he looked at the end of a rope
step down or face god;s judement
Yes, terrorists would love Obama!!! He has probably far surpassed their expectations in letting them out of jail, calling them harmless, allowing them into America without any real vetting. Americans believe he has been a failure to protect Americans and their rights and their freedom of speech. The lust goes on and on. Yes, he has failed America greatly!!! Time to move on and put Trump in the White House so that he can make America great again!!!
Therefore, it should be evident that if the purpose of the requirement to be a “natural born citizen” is to prevent anyone with foreign citizenship from serving as President, it cannot achieve that end unless, by definition, the phrase “natural born citizen” excludes anyone who might have acquired foreign citizenship by means of any one of the three modalities recognized by the law of nations: 1) jus soli (born on foreign soil), 2) jus sanguinis (born to a parent with foreign citizenship), or 3) naturalization by a foreign country. John Jay’s request to Washington makes no sense otherwise, since in that case his suggested eligibility requirement would not preclude what he was seeking to prevent.
It should be noted that a person can become a citizen or subject of a foreign country by naturalization after one has has been born. To be logically consistent with the intent of the Founders, those US citizens—even if born in the US to parents who were both US citizens—who have any foreign citizenship, no matter when or how acquired, should not be eligible to be President. This issue has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It’s a question of loyalty and avoidance of even the appearance of conflict of interest. Nothing more, and nothing less.
Never was my president!
Traitor
Good
HELL YES