The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
Gestapo tactics to be sure William S. Brenaman.
If this is true, a President Cruz would be the best person to get it changed!
You want free$#%&!@*this is what you get. Nothing is free ever. The only ones that have benefited from all of this is the bastards elected into office. Next time a politician off up some free$#%&!@*like healthcare. Think twice.
Stfu
Sounds like the Carpet baggers are in a hot seat finally
Everyone look into Marc stevens. He wins traffic cases, irs audits, and some criminal cases with this method.
One is presumed innocent of every ELEMENT of the crime. An essential element is jurisdiction. So the judge is suppose to ( key phrase ) assume that they don’t even have the authority to hear the case, unless the prosecution has submitted evidence for jurisdiction. You can prove collusion between the prosecution and the judge.
I remember there was a brief movement a decade ago regarding voluntary taxes, anyone remember Wesley Snipes…so where did he go wrong?
Bet this is the truth!
Ask Wesley Snipes if it’s ok to not pay income taxes. Look, if you live in the U.S. you have to pay taxes. That’s the law. Sure, it sucks, but that’s how our system of government works. You’re not going to find anywhere in the world where you don’t have to pay taxes. Stop being completely stupid.
God save us from idiots like you. Apparently you believe his constant democrat lies.
STILL no truth…and never any action