The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
excellent. for the future, it’s stronger to play up how people have been wronged, violations of law, etc.
When more focus is put on how people have been wronged and more on the corruption, we will see the story go more viral.
Please remember to set all drop downs to yes.
Dodgy income tax laws in U.S.
i wish$#%&!@*like this would surprise me
The 16th. Amendment was and has never been ratified for starters, thus the IRS is an Illegal “entity” in accordance to the United States Republic. However by proxy the UNITED STATES CORPORATION controls and dictates IRS codes and policies. By proxy because the IRS is a Corporation subject to the Authority of the IMF in pursuant of the Maritime Law, governed and administered through the agreed terms of UCC.
Lol…Treason!!!
don’t know if it has been 150 years,, but the figure is not far off.
Starting from April 2 the international community has been actively expressing concerns about the unstable situation around Nagorno Karabakh. Particularly, all the regional and international organizations and separate states call on the both sides of the conflict to show restraint, stop combat actions, refrain from any further provocative action, etc.
The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia (MOD) attaches great importance to the response of the international community and its calls on both sides of the conflict. The MOD underlines that the Republic of Armenia is the guarantor of security of Nagorno Karabakh. Meantime, as a party that does not take part in any hostilities, the MOD especially appreciates the fact that all those calls refer to the authorities of Azerbaijan and Karabakh, the two parties that de-facto engaged in hostilities.
The MOD supports all the calls to stop combat actions and attaches the attention of the international community to the fact that in order to establish a ceasefire regime on the frontline between Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh it is of vital importance to agree on and implement concrete actions: develop technical conditions for the ceasefire regime, manage the process of taking back the confronting forces and develop mechanisms to maintain the ceasefire regime.
Simultaneously, the MOD attaches the attention of international community, including international organizations dealing with human rights and humanity issues to the fact that the activities implemented by Azerbaijani authorities violate such international documents as UN Charter, Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States signed in 1970, Helsinki Final act of 1975, and other documents of Helsinki process.
During the combat actions initiated by Azerbaijan Azerbaijani military forces and armed groups launched such activities in regards to the civilians of Nagorno Karabakh and the soldiers that have a lot in common with the activities of international terrorist groups. Those activities are military crimes according to international humanitarian law.
Torturing army prisoners and combatants who no longer take part in military actions, up to decapitation, filming the process and broadcasting it, and also mass killings of civilians, torturing the corpses, etc. are the most vital examples of military crimes.
The MOD declares that both the authorities of Azerbaijan and the people engaged in military crimes should be brought to responsibility (also in front of the international community) for violation of international law.
Starting from April 2 the international community has been actively expressing concerns about the unstable situation around Nagorno Karabakh. Particularly, all the regional and international organizations and separate states call on the both sides of the conflict to show restraint, stop combat actions, refrain from any further provocative action, etc.
The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia (MOD) attaches great importance to the response of the international community and its calls on both sides of the conflict. The MOD underlines that the Republic of Armenia is the guarantor of security of Nagorno Karabakh. Meantime, as a party that does not take part in any hostilities, the MOD especially appreciates the fact that all those calls refer to the authorities of Azerbaijan and Karabakh, the two parties that de-facto engaged in hostilities.
The MOD supports all the calls to stop combat actions and attaches the attention of the international community to the fact that in order to establish a ceasefire regime on the frontline between Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh it is of vital importance to agree on and implement concrete actions: develop technical conditions for the ceasefire regime, manage the process of taking back the confronting forces and develop mechanisms to maintain the ceasefire regime.
Simultaneously, the MOD attaches the attention of international community, including international organizations dealing with human rights and humanity issues to the fact that the activities implemented by Azerbaijani authorities violate such international documents as UN Charter, Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States signed in 1970, Helsinki Final act of 1975, and other documents of Helsinki process.
During the combat actions initiated by Azerbaijan Azerbaijani military forces and armed groups launched such activities in regards to the civilians of Nagorno Karabakh and the soldiers that have a lot in common with the activities of international terrorist groups. Those activities are military crimes according to international humanitarian law.
Torturing army prisoners and combatants who no longer take part in military actions, up to decapitation, filming the process and broadcasting it, and also mass killings of civilians, torturing the corpses, etc. are the most vital examples of military crimes.
The MOD declares that both the authorities of Azerbaijan and the people engaged in military crimes should be brought to responsibility (also in front of the international community) for violation of international law.
and the damn Federal Courts should be put up for Treason then – where is the justice for All Americans – they need a wake-up call.