Since the men and women who serve as judges attended law school, the question must be asked what these law schools are teaching. Or perhaps a better question would be, “with what are these law schools indoctrinating their students?” Far too often we learn of judicial decisions that make no sense, and we’re not talking only of the bizarre decisions federal judges have made regarding President Trump’s travel ban.
The courts have power because the people respect them and the executive branches enforce their decisions. Take these away, and the courts just turn into editorial departments. Sometimes it seems like that is the direction they wish to take.
More on page two.
^ It’s the people’s roads, the people paid for them and made them.
Kenny Lee Mcgainey But the people exercise no control of them, so they are not really the people’s roads are they?
Yet another state to avoid.
In Kansas it just appears to have become evidence that a crime has been committed if you eat lunch in your car and then recline to take a nap. Has the state run out of criminals to pursue that its police must busy themselves on such ridiculous and unconstitutional pursuits?
When the people who are supposed to uphold the law of the don’t,there will only be jungle law.
Totally agree with you David Kent.
The “stupid” and those who support them, make programs for them, spend tax dollars for them, have convinced sociery that they are “victims” when in reality, they are simple people who make stupid choices and continue to make them because idiots keep enabling them.
Sad deal and it will be the death of our country same as it was the death of Rome and so many other societies in history.
In other words, this guy was caught committing a crime and sought to apply the invented and unconstitutional exclusionary rule to throw facts out of the case. And judges refused to employ their invention to save his ass.
The real outrage of course is the invention of an exclusionary rule to throw out an arrest of a guilty party on the fiction that the police ought not to have caught him in the first place, a lie imposed on Americans by unelected judges imagining the law they like.
Be grateful that judge Garland didn’t get on to SCOTUS! He has, to a decision sided with increasing the authority of the federal government.
Wonder if the passenger was cited for no/or improper use of a seat belt as it would limit it’s effectiveness if fully reclined.