One purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent a limited number of pockets of dense population from determining the outcome of presidential elections. In that sense, it is a bit similar to the US Senate, and acts to give powers to the states as opposed to treating the country as one large electorate.
Without the Electoral College, the recent election would have been decided by heavily populated cities in the states of California and New York. With that in mind, voters could expect to see candidates spend the overwhelming majority of their time in geographical areas with dense populations, leaving those with sparse populations largely ignored.
Liberals chafe at the Electoral College for the same reason they are irritated by each state getting two senators regardless of population — it gives power to the states and recognizes them as significant political entities. It’s the same as the “states’ rights” argument which militates against a powerful national government. Hence, this is not a new argument at all, but one that goes back to the founding of our nation.
That liberals hate the Electoral College is illustrated by the comments of one Supreme Court justice. More on page two.
So her liberal voter fraud associates can get into office without the votes of the “Flyover States”???
Keep You Promise and Leave Our Beloved Country! You Liberal Socialist Piece of Scum!
You no can do babe.
Too old and senile time for change
The executive, legislative and judicial branches of our government are supposed to a system of “checks and balances” This FUCKING$#%&!@*is guilty of TREASON by aiding and abetting the enemy. Hang the$#%&!@*!! NOW !!
Why is this liberal loser still in this country ?
You do not have the right to change it, you are not part of the legislative branch
take a nap
Drop dead you Dried up old Bitch
Just shut up and go CHANGE your diaper