One purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent a limited number of pockets of dense population from determining the outcome of presidential elections. In that sense, it is a bit similar to the US Senate, and acts to give powers to the states as opposed to treating the country as one large electorate.
Without the Electoral College, the recent election would have been decided by heavily populated cities in the states of California and New York. With that in mind, voters could expect to see candidates spend the overwhelming majority of their time in geographical areas with dense populations, leaving those with sparse populations largely ignored.
Liberals chafe at the Electoral College for the same reason they are irritated by each state getting two senators regardless of population — it gives power to the states and recognizes them as significant political entities. It’s the same as the “states’ rights” argument which militates against a powerful national government. Hence, this is not a new argument at all, but one that goes back to the founding of our nation.
That liberals hate the Electoral College is illustrated by the comments of one Supreme Court justice. More on page two.
NO! NO! NO!
Go back to sleep!
Sorry stupid liberal. You don’t get to do that
I’ll bet your Liberal old$#%&!@*would if you could…
Old thing just need’s to go home and STFU
One we would like to see is you disappearing /
You know what I like everyone of you progressive to drop dead because if you don’t true Americans will someday have to shut you to protect the old and the kid’s from your Nazis party
Senile like Pelosi and Waters!!!
That way democrats will not loose.
I doubt she cud stay awake long enough to make a proposal.