While the country is still reeling from Barack Obama’s executive actions on guns last week, at least one Hollywood actress is begging for more.
Julianne Moore reacted to the president’s move by asking state legislatures and congress to further restrict gun ownership, likening the move to the move to make seatbelt usage mandatory.
The link between the two items are weak to say the least, and just further proves how out-of-touch Hollywood is when it comes to guns.
While they think that guns being purchased by law abiding citizens are running rampart on the streets, killing the innocent folks we hear about all too often on the news, the facts show us that the opposite is true. Guns purchased legally defend us against guns obtained criminally.
Meanwhile, while they talk so dismissively of legal gun owners, they do so behind the guns of the security and police working to keep their events safe. How ironic.
To see Julianne Moore’s statements, read on to the next page:
Poor ignorant woman.
Who cares?
She doesn’t have a clue.
C**t
never mind Julianne Moore she is an has been she was on daytime shows and so this is one way even i remmeber her from these daytime shows so go away JULIANNE
These liberal idiots will support Obama just b ease he is black. If you talked to anyone of them and asked about any of his accomplishments. They couldn’t answer , and if they did, tbey would be just repeat what lies Obama has said with no factual support. These actors don’t know what reality is.
Just shut off theiir money………….it is that easy. It won’t be long before they start calling us un-American for boycotting them….and we can just smile, and tell them to get their money from all the muslims. And…who is this anyway? Nobody I know…or care about as far as movies go because I already boycott all you jerks. Wanted to see the new Star Wars …but it has the racist Sa”mule” L Jackson in it…can’t give HIM any of MY money.
Screw that red headed huzzy, someone get her a muslim terrorist refugee to care for, maybe she will change her mind!
Another idiot bummer butt kisser!
The Constitution law forbids judges or lawmakers from infringing or passing legislation “editing” any amendment outside a constitutional convention. That amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
We all must read, and CORRECTLY understand the U.S. Constitution (and related Supreme Court cases) when it comes to checks and balances, separation of powers, etc.
WHOSOEVER tries to enforce such legal fictions is to be resisted by ALL FORCE necessary INCLUDING lethal force. IT IS YOUR DUTY as an american to assist in the Lawful Resistance of UNLAWFUL legislation in the event you witness a fellow american being oppressed whether he knows his rights, conforms, or not!
Treason: crime of disloyalty to one’s nation or state. A person who bet,rays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor.
The defense of the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. (See The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946).
All it requires is for those who have taken their oaths of office to act on what they swore they would actually do.