WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange inserted himself into the 2016 race in a major way before the Democratic national Convention, releasing leaked emails that forced the resignation of many DNC officials — including Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
Assange continued the Democrat assault weeks later, starting a series called “Hillary leaks.” The series once again released thousands of emails that the organization has obtained, and has also proved damaging to Clinton’s campaign.
Since then, many have criticized WikiLeaks’ focus on damaging only Democrat politicians. When asked about it on Fox News’ The Kelly File, Assange claimed that he would release damaging information against both sides, if obtained. He also promised that he had at least one more damaging leak in store for Mrs. Clinton.
But what of the Republicans?
According to Assange, there just isn’t much there. Not compared to what’s already available, anyway.
See what info Assange does have on the GOP on the next page:

I hope he waits until Trump takes office before releasing anymore on Hillary. I don’t want to take a chance on Obama giving her a pardon and maybe they think this thing will all blow over now.
Where was his devastating information about Clinton he promised?
To counter Obummer’s constant pardoning of criminals and future folks on the list such as Hitlary and the gang, Trump should grant immunity to Eric Snowden and political asylum to Julian Assange. That would create an interesting first 100 days
NOTICE this says ‘Sponsored’, which means the headline tricks you into click bait. That is all. Don’t fall for ti.
B******t. You haven’t realized that most people are tired of being lied to? If he had it he would have already released it.
always look who posted this and read on………..
Click bait. Nothing, don’t waist your time.
wait he told fox news? doesnt that just sound suspicious
Billy Hess
The fact you think it only works on liberals shows how well that same tactic works on you. I mean, that is how Trump got elected after all; a bunch of clickbait headlines on an article that ultimately proves nothing, it just echoes what you already believe.
The same guy who said “they won’t let Trump be president “? That guy?