WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange inserted himself into the 2016 race in a major way before the Democratic national Convention, releasing leaked emails that forced the resignation of many DNC officials — including Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
Assange continued the Democrat assault weeks later, starting a series called “Hillary leaks.” The series once again released thousands of emails that the organization has obtained, and has also proved damaging to Clinton’s campaign.
Since then, many have criticized WikiLeaks’ focus on damaging only Democrat politicians. When asked about it on Fox News’ The Kelly File, Assange claimed that he would release damaging information against both sides, if obtained. He also promised that he had at least one more damaging leak in store for Mrs. Clinton.
But what of the Republicans?
According to Assange, there just isn’t much there. Not compared to what’s already available, anyway.
See what info Assange does have on the GOP on the next page:
republicans tend to hide their sht better most times. thats why alot are in for so long without goin to jail
nothing
I heard trump was a serial killer i had to weigh that against obama and hillary so hell i voted trump .id rather have a serial killer that gets it done than those losers
70 lawsuits? Considering his wealth and real estate holdings, that’s not surprising. This is common knowledge in the real estate world. Anyone who owns more than a few properties automatically becomes the target of lawsuit after lawsuit by bottom feeding lawyers and people looking to “soak the rich.” Those who own many properties end up trying to hide the fact by creating trusts and such, so it is harder to find out what they own out there.
Lie
AT THIS POINT, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?!?!?!?!?!?!
it’s almost like people have been trying to sue rich people since the advent of the lawsuit….man people just don’t get it…
Washington Post hired 20 reporters to dig us information on Trump they found nothing either- do they made stuff up and paid people to lie-
NOTHING
So misleading. He has nothing because there is nothing