The Left is always willing to cite Supreme Court cases and demand that the states and the people abide by the high court’s decisions. Unless, of course, the decisions are contrary to the leftist ideology, in which case there will be an endless parade of liberal legislators creating new laws to tell the people what they can and cannot do, even when it directly contradicts a Supreme Court ruling. They always think they know better and are more than willing to ignore settled case law if it suits their liberal agenda.
This is glaringly obvious when it comes to gun laws that various cities and states impose on citizens in response to violence that they are unable to control in their jurisdictions. In places such as Los Angeles, California, Washington D.C., and Chicago, Illinois, it is clear that criminal activity is out of control, in spite of the fact that these cities have some of the most draconian anti-gun laws on the books. But with criminals running wild, and citizens cowering in their homes and staying far away from downtown areas because the criminals having free reign, what is the automatic reaction of liberals and left leaning politicians? Why, taking away guns from law-abiding citizens!
In 2008, a case entitled District of Columbia v. Heller finally reached the Supreme Court, and a decision was handed down that many thought would put an end to the constant squabbling over who had the right to own a gun, and what the terms for such ownership were. It turns out that certain cities and states have decided to completely ignore that ruling and to institute laws that essentially bar ownership of guns within their jurisdiction. It is outrageous, and it must stop!
New restrictions on guns, page 2:
Corruption at it finest people have no morals anymore
Every politician that makes laws that try to outright ban our constitutional rights or tries to subvert them should be arrested as traitors and imprisoned for life
The left fears guns in the hands of the people because the only way they can institute their political agenda is by force against an unarmed population.
Wrong
The original Bill of Rights…. Cannot Be Amended…
DukeAdkisson whats up with those people.
It was Yamamoto who said that to the Imperial War Council. He was partially educated in the USA and knew the capability of our country. He also knew a prolonged war could never be won by the Japanese.
Sounds like Illinois needs to do some recalling in your houses, that is if your all not Dumbacrats!!!
They keep slowly changing it little by little over time and we just get used to it and allow it to happen… cause we are all afraid to live without the comforts and security we have come so accustomed to
their intent is treason.