As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
None will they will find all true patriots dead in a pile of brass state’s can’t gov can’t take guns from Americans the second was written for a tyrannical gov. So they will take them up north maybe but down south they better bring every soldier in the world. Sick of hearing gun grab come grab them sick of hearing gov wants to break law replace gov.
IT’S TREASON ON AMERICAN BE READY AMERICAN HE’LL IS COMING TO AMERICAN
Applause for Idaho.
Amen brother, tell em what the 10th means
Sooooo its called an amendment… but the constitution is “set in stone”?
I’m a gun owner, I support gun ownership and the Obama administration does too. What he’s asking for is a national data base for instant background checks and banning automatic and semi automatic assault style rifles that are capable of carrying 100 round clips of ammunition. To me this sounds reasonable. People who say that he wants to confiscate everyone’s guns or ban the sales of all guns is just wrong. He’s been President for 7 years and he hasn’t taken anybody’s gun yet, has he?
Why not! “Sanctuary Cities” such as San Francisco are embraced by liberals who want to protect illegal immigration. Why should the states not provide sanctuary for American citizens who want to legally own firearms?
All states should band together
Thank you
It’s called Nullification. It didn’t work out all that well in 1861-1865 either.
Stupid people here reside!