As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Well no read the words. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State. Sure you need a well-organized military force to defend your country. But the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. This is the people in contrast to the militia it doesn’t say the right of the militia to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed it says the right of the people. Now why the word people? Because the people who wrote this had just fought a war for two years against a tyrannical state militia. And they knew the time might come when they would have to do that again. So they made the possession of weapons a right that the militia could never take away. Now gun control advocates say the phrasing is clumsy and the comma separating the state from the people … is just a pause for you to catch your breath. Strange . They can’t seem to find any other place in the constitution where those hack framers fucked up the wording!
This is all a person needs to rely upon and look back upon anytime anyone wants to start talking about taking away the Second Amendment and our right to bear arms. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment about semi automatic weapons there’s nothing in it about not being able to have or being able to own. There’s nothing in it about not being able to stand up against your government either. All you anti gun people need to realize the first time you let them take ANY right out of the Constitution.You are giving them the go ahead to take care EVERY right out of the Constitution. Including the 1st the 10th the 4th the 9th and any other right that is given to you by the Constitution. In essence if you are against the Second Amendment and want it taken away from people you are in no better way of saying this, SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT! Shall not be infringed! No argument is needed because no argument can stand against that phrase! 2nd for life!!!
Well no read the words. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State. Sure you need a well-organized military force to defend your country. But the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. This is the people in contrast to the militia it doesn’t say the right of the militia to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed it says the right of the people. Now why the word people? Because the people who wrote this had just fought a war for two years against a tyrannical state militia. And they knew the time might come when they would have to do that again. So they made the possession of weapons a right that the militia could never take away. Now gun control advocates say the phrasing is clumsy and the comma separating the state from the people … is just a pause for you to catch your breath. Strange . They can’t seem to find any other place in the constitution where those hack framers fucked up the wording!
This is all a person needs to rely upon and look back upon anytime anyone wants to start talking about taking away the Second Amendment and our right to bear arms. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment about semi automatic weapons there’s nothing in it about not being able to have or being able to own. There’s nothing in it about not being able to stand up against your government either. All you anti gun people need to realize the first time you let them take ANY right out of the Constitution.You are giving them the go ahead to take care EVERY right out of the Constitution. Including the 1st the 10th the 4th the 9th and any other right that is given to you by the Constitution. In essence if you are against the Second Amendment and want it taken away from people you are in no better way of saying this, SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT! Shall not be infringed! No argument is needed because no argument can stand against that phrase! 2nd for life!!!
This man is fuckin Muslim
Hell yeah, p**s on the rules. Gone too far…
Let’s hope his liberal judges do not overstep their duties AGAIN
No wonder I live in Idaho!
The Executive office (President) cannot make law, it can only propose a law. Only congress can make a law.
I don’t know why he is still alive
Retire scum
More states need to stand up to him. The governors need to take control of their states and take nothing from the feds that’s the only way to eliminate them.