As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Yasmine Smrekar You Madam are incorrect. The term ‘regulated’ circa 1700’s meant well supplied or in good working order and was not used in the context that it is today.
Yep-about a 96 percent non-compliance rate.
yea yea like the gov. of states saying no to refugees and yet they have towns being over run with them and crime rate is way up in their state. smoke and mirrors.
Issac-no you can’t buy a “military grade assault rifle” without having a Class 3 FFL. The definition of assault rifle is one that is selectable fire-i.e.-fully automatic. None of the AR 15’s or AK’s that are sold to the public at large are fully automatic-hence they are not assault rifles at all but semi-automatic rifles and functionally no different from a semi automatic deer rifle.
just another reason to move to Idaho.
MOON LABE
I love Idaho
Fuk obamA
Michael Gazard I don’t give a$#%&!@*how it’s punctuated, how does “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state” negate the fact that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”? HINT: IT DOESN’T! It doesn’t say, shall not be infringed unless they aren’t “well regulated”, does not define well regulated anyway. It does say the people (not the state, not the National Guard, not the Secret Service, THE PEOPLE) have the right to keep (own, have, possess) and bear (carry) arms (rifles, pistols, swords, etc.)!
Come on guys you’re going to make wussy boy cry again.