As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Yep ……serious as a heart beat !!!!!!!
Me neither.
F**k this Muslim basterd arrest this$#%&!@*
No U.S. Citizen is gonna give up their gun
All right
NationRay Brimm Yes, we agree, it’s in our blood – Give us Freedom or give us Death!
Yeah!!0
convention of the states.
There one goes equivocating already! And you got your degree where?
“obama DOES want to take away your guns”
Don’t believe his lies! The ruse used by him to ban guns, of any type, is to prevent deaths and increase our safety. Guns are not the problem.
For those of you stupid enough to believe that obama does not want to take away your guns (just because he says so) here is a fact: obama has consistently shown support for an assault weapons ban. A “ban” means that you don’t get to buy it, own it, possess it, keep it, etc., or in plain terms, AKA = TAKE AWAY. The problem with that is the fact that ANY GUN can be an “assault weapon.” Assault is an ACTION, not a gun type, and therefore ANY GUN can be banned. Once banned, it can and will be illegal and taken away. According to the government, the only difference between a hunting rifle and an “assault weapon” is the military style “features”, not capability. The sights, stock, mounting, looks, or even color can be used to ban a gun.
Contrary to obama’s beliefs and sorry education, our forefathers did not create the 2nd amendment to enable the citizens of the United States to have guns and only limit them to shoot bambies and bunnies. It was created to allow us to defend ourselves against a tyrannical and out of control government. For that, we don’t need BB guns and Airsoft pellet guns. They meant all guns, including the “current” military style weapons just like the government had at that time, otherwise it would be suicidal to try to fight the tyrannical government. They thought the statement “Shall not be infringed” would be clear enough to even the most incompetent dolt on the public payroll. I’m sure they never thought we would ever be stupid enough that we could even redefine what “shall not” is and what “is” is.