As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
The constitution is not set in stone. That’s why there are amendments. Amendments have been repealed as well
Same rules apply with sanctuary cites.
way to go idaho. after all a lot of sporting goods come from idaho. wyoming has a similar law , we out here have an “east” infection and we dont want no part of it.
Governor Mary Fallin
Obama chooses to let states ignore federal drug laws, especially those involving marijuana. Obama chooses to let states have sanctuary cities thus supporting his non-enforcement policy of immigration laws. Obama chooses to side with criminals against local police when they enforce their local laws by raising the specter of racism even before facts are fully known . Obama chooses to give Islamic terrorists a pass by calling acts such as San Bernadino and Philadelphia criminal rather than terrorism even when facts showing what they clearly are have been established. If the President who is charged by Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” can choose to ignore and circumvent his responsibilities in favor of political agenda, then it seems only right that the states under the 10th Amendment can and should assert their rights by telling the feds to kiss it.
Well it’s pretty simple folks the president can’t make laws! Period! Don’t for get that! He can flap his gums all he wants.
Velvet Rose STOP YELLING at people!!!
http://www.zazzle.com/president_trump_2016_tee_shirt-235853342127714263
Sherman Davis Income taxes are legal.
We are a Federation of independent Republics, at least on paper and as was originally crafted by our constitution. The states need to get back to this concept.