As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Sorry I don’t see it that way at all we have 2 guns but their legal and our background check was approved why should people with questionable backgrounds (such as a criminal background or mentally unstable ) have a gun ?
Go back to Kenya you communist , Muslim parasite.
Criminals yes some mentally ill no.
I don’t believe in taking guns away from all mentally ill people.
Just the dangerous mentally ill people need to be disarmed.
Not the non violent mentally ill people.
The non violent mentally ill people should still be able to have guns to protect themselves in their homes.
I also believe that guns should only be in the homes to protect you.
Not out on the streets in public.
I don’t think people should be carrying guns in public.
Leave them in your car or home.
Not on you.
I don’t feel safe walking down the street knowing Alot of people carrying guns now,and a chance of getting hit by a stray bullet
The only other way to fight back is just kick Obama out of office where he doesn’t belong any way… EVERYTHING HE DONE TURNED TO$#%&!@*and made it nothing but worse for the middle class people he needs to go to prison with Hillary
Ok we agree on many things Brian you sound like a reasonable person your right on the mentally ill situation ty
The continued Game of DIVIDE and CONTROL of the SLAVES. Tools of Control, Fear, Religion, F**e Money, F**e Politices (Government) and Brainwashing by the F**e Media.
The State of Kansas has already done this.
All mentally ill people should be able to protect themselves in the “home”.
Keyword home.
And prohibit mentally ill from ccw.
Other words they are only allowed to keep guns in their homes and not on the streets.
Any mentally ill people caught outside there home with a gun loses their guns and their rights and spend time in jail for possessing a gun in public.
There should be restrictions on types of guns mentally ill people Are allowed to have.
3 are just enough to stop someone yet less risk of hitting innocent people.
2 handguns 22 Cal and 38 call
1 shotgun 410 gauge.
Those are the only 3 mentally ill people should have.
No other gun with higher power then the 3 posted and no guns with clips.
Guns with less bullets save lives
Those 3 guns will stop a intruder and do less damage in the home and won’t exit through the walls and hit a innocent person outside the home