As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/15/washington-state-dem-introduces-bill-banning-possession-of-assault-weapons/
good
Hats off to Obama, the great devider
If states hate the fed this much secede from the union, don’t let the door slap you in the back side
Nullification baby.
Do you really believe that?
Good. I hope Montana follows soon.
the niggro Muslim looks a bit confused ‘aaaaaaaaaaahahahaaa ”ALL i have to say is what a joke ‘ and y ‘ the new GUN laws will never never work when all most ALL the killings ARE from guns sold on the street s and most of the killing s are done by his savages the niggro s ‘so life goes on and aaaaaaaaahahahaaaa ‘what a joke!
Okay you FK up now they’re going to round you up for their newly built detention canps, lol
I do not disagree with you on type, place, or anytime statement. I would agree that there are restrictions that could be put into place by Congress. However I am not sure i would agree with you about original intent or the ability of a President to write a law.