As progressives, rallied by the Obama administration, actively work to curb Americans’ gun rights, one state has raised it’s hand and said “Stop!”
Just last Friday, Idaho announced that it would neither enforce nor abide by federal gun laws. The move was made possible by a measure introduced in the state’s House and Senate and passed unanimously by both chambers.
The law could very well be one of the most serious challenges to the federal government’s anti-gun agenda. Per the wording of the bill, Idaho law enforcement officers would face up to $1,000 in fines as well as misdemeanor charges if they enforce federal gun laws. These punitive measures will likely go a long way in discouraging Idaho LEO’s from collaborating with feds trying to enforce gun laws in the state.
Naturally, the federal government, to say nothing of this virulently anti-gun administration, is not going to be happy about a state rejecting it’s statutes regarding gun ownership and usage. Indeed, after a similar law was passed in Kansas, former Attorney General Eric Holder, a true maven of the gun control lobby, wrote a letter to Governor Brownback threatening legal action against the state over it.
Let’s hope that Idaho is able stay strong if Obama and his goons try to stop them.
Turn to the next page for more info:
good$#%&!@*Obama
F**k you Obama your no president of mine you can go$#%&!@*your self got that you terrorist
49 to go. Screw liberals and Democrats
I’m from Ohio and I hope our Governor stands up and just say no to Obama’s gun snatching scheme,I will not give up my gun.I live alone with my wife.we are both over 74 and if some thud decides to break in,what am I supposed to do.Call 911 and hope the cops get there before we are murdered..I think I’ll just keep my gun.
Don’t matter what my state does, it’s gonna be business as usual.
Here’s just one of hundreds of bills if you bothered to research the matter. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/15/washington-state-dem-introduces-bill-banning-possession-of-assault-weapons/
Oh another genius who thinks he knows more about “well regulated” and a “militia” than the founding fathers and courts do
Maybe you need to study the history of the word regulate John. At the time of the 2nd, it meant “in good working order” such as “a well regulated clock.” By that definition, a well regulated (working order) militia is also well equipped.
No one is coming for our guns? You really live under a rock. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/15/washington-state-dem-introduces-bill-banning-possession-of-assault-weapons/
Oh now that is rich. Gun worshippers want to cry original intent when they really don’t want to go there. I am pretty familiar with the law and fully agree that law abiding mentally stable citizens should be able to own guns , and that the 2and has never in our history meant that anyone can own any type of gun, nor carry a gun anytime and anywhere they wish