“Change”
“Change We Can Believe In”
Yes we can… elect President Obama for life.
That last one was once relegated to communist fantasies and dark web conspiracy sites.
Now, Hillary Clinton is willing to offer a Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) seat to President Barrack Hussien Obama if she is elected President in 2016.
This ideas had been floated before and there were versions where Hillary becomes the forever judge instead of Obama but the threat to the free world remains the same. In a time of political revolution against establishment politics, once has to wonder what kind of confidence Clinton suddenly has that she will win in Iowa. Her numbers were better than Bernie’s but she has been feeling the Bern in a bad way becasue she is seen as Washington Royalty.
There has to be a little more in play Hillary to make such an inside-the-betlway play of making the current troubled President a lifer on the SCOTUS. Her confidence is bolstered by something, but what could it be?
The President’s record is troubled too, that’s why Bernie Sander’s campaign is possible. Bernie just rehashes the same old commie-lite talking points from 2008 and it sound great to young people becasue President Obama didn’t deliver too much on his unicorn and rainbows platform. That’s how socialism works, each successive socialist is the one who will “do it better” than the last guy.
For President Obama, the spectacle of watching Hillary sweat is something to relish.
Please see the next page for Obama as SCOTUS details.
Let’s tear up the constitution even more folks
They were not Disbarred !!! They surrendered their licenses to avoid being prosecuted and being disbarred. I don’t think they can “practice” law though,
Are you kidding me?
Go on the internet Wright Marco Rubio bother watch what pops up wow
Sure would be nice something like a piano were to fall on her
Well Hillary thanks for the heads up. Now I know where not to put my vote!
She is not going to b prez.even libs can’t b that stupid.
Depends on what your definition of disbarred is. Lol
REALLY BEFORE OR AFTER THE FBI AND CONGRESS PROSACUTE YOU.. You must read this to fully comprehend what Hillary Clinton has done.
If you read nothing else read paragraph number 7.
Date: January 30, 2016 at 11:41:52 AM EST
Subject: Hillary’s Classified Information Breech
There have been suggestions that all this kerfuffle over Hillary’s security breech has been politically motivated. But it is a fact that what we know already is a punishable offense, and the seriousness of the breach may be even worse than originally reported, despite the desultory mutterings from the White House that there is nothing there to warrant an indictment.
The attached tutorial from a retired U.S. Army officer on the federal government’s classification system will be helpful in understanding
the seriousness of Clinton ’s careless and blatant breaches of it, and what it says about her competence, judgement, and trustworthiness to be the Chief Executive of the Land. Les
WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE:
My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart , Germany . In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news. Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:
1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.
2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.
3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.
4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.
5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.
6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA . Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Ed ward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.
7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.
As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.
If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.
If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.
If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government. If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.
If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.
ED COET
Major , US Army (Retired)
P.S. It is my sincere hope that each of you will share this article, to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is. We can’t allow anyone so careless with this level of information to have access to any classified information ever again for as long as she lives. This would surely render her unqualified and unfit to hold any public office let alone POTUS if this allegation proves to be true
We’ve had enough of him I wouldn’t vote for her for this reason for sure