The federal government seeks to strip us of our ability to protect ourselves with bill H.R. 378 (revision of H. R. 5344), Responsible Body Armor Possession Act, which was just brought to the House this month.
The bill bans the sale, ownership and possession of body armor and comes with a 10 year prison sentence for violations.
The communists not only don’t want you to have guns, they don’t want you to be able to protect yourself from criminals or terrorists either….government or otherwise.
CONTINUE READING ON PAGE 2 + WATCH VIDEO:
How about something more serious like an assassination……with the best intentions of course. We don’t need malicious intent.
So civilians can’t where body armor even when all the evil assault rifles are out there killing everybody? Weird. So you can’t protect yourself from…….oh anything.
So what’s there big objective about citizens having body protection a bullet will go through my cotton shirt same as it will a cops.
Ray… You’re an idiot. Don’t comment on thing you know nothing about. Its not really a delusion when everywhere in the US is getting shot to$#%&!@* Nor is everyone getting riled up over our guns and body armor being taken away a result of fear. Its the fact that out rights and freedoms are being tampered with.
Good, you should stay there.
Clifton McKnight Actually, I have probably seen more of the USA than most Americans and have visited 42 states so far and visit upper New York a few times a month. Thanks for your concern though.
I never specified in the USA , I said that this WORLD has seen. Let’s please pay attention. And I only need to know of one (although I will share more) to learn a lesson and be prepared. It would seem my forefathers thought the same when making our constitution. Just because something hasn’t happened in our generation or parents , doesn’t mean it is no longer a threat. That’s like saying a serial criminal or murderer that hasn’t committed broken the law in awhile isn’t no longer a threat. They still are . Now onwards to some examples in history:
1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 6 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
Keep in mind, this is only even examples of mass murder when in relation to gun control, not including mass genocide committed by governments without enforcing it. If you can honestly say that after everything this world has seen you feel comfortable letting the government have complete power then you either do not remember history very well, or are way too complacent based off your own experiences on this earth. You need to humble yourself and remember that just because it has not happened to you, does not mean it will not, or to one of your ancestors down the road. Always remember things like this don’t just happen. They don’t say they are going to take your guns so they can commit genocide they say they are gonna take guns to protect you, and what follows is obvious.
Owell.. if Hilary can break the law so can everyone else
Michael Storm You really did not need to cut and paste that article from the Warrior Times as I am quite familiar with it and other similar articles. We could debate this till the cows come home, but I do believe that our mindsets are so entrenched that the likelihood of any semblance of agreement is remote at best. I will leave you with this however… you do know that the removal of guns in Germany was something that was imposed by the Allies after WW1 and that the laws were more flexible in 1939. I do believe that you are confusing the term “Gun controls” with the total banning of guns and they are not the same at all. Nothing wrong with guns, but surely some semblance of controls can be justified.
Todd Holloway have you read this non sense!?!