I wonder how happy George Soros is with all the attention he’s been getting? My guess is that, considering what his goals are, he’d prefer to fly a bit more under the radar. In spite of the name of his “Open Societies Foundation,” transparency of motives is not a priority for Mr. Soros. It’s our old friend “relativism” again — someone’s words often mean something other than what the person would have you believe they mean.
For a close-up view of how this works, we can turn to Soros’ efforts to purportedly increase participation in the election process, and the removal of supposed barriers to that participation. Taken at face value, that doesn’t sound bad. Who wouldn’t support encouraging citizens to participate in the their elections?
But there’s something missing from this description. And as is often the case, what isn’t said is more important to an accurate understanding that what is said. Here are the words you can add to the above discussion to really understand Soros’ motives.
IF you no this then why not stop him,don’t get it
HE IS A DYING MAN. HE PROBABLY WILL BE GONE BEFORE ELECTION/ PRAY FOR HIS SOUL. HE IS SO VILE
This old$#%&!@*has been working for years to destroy America, and if Hillary gets elected he will use her to finish the job.
Screw this ignorant worthless piece of c**p this$#%&!@*out of me in jail right next to Hillary and Obama
THIS MAN LOOKS AS IF HE NEEDS A TALK WITH GOD
ARREST Soros too.
Let’s hang this mother fucker
Bang !
Truth and Action: Mr. Soros is not interested in encouraging the citizens as a whole to participate more actively in the electoral process. You need to add the missing words, “among those groups most likely to vote for leftest candidates” to get it right.
So Soros’ Open Societies Foundation as well as Mr. Soros himself are funding strategies to encourage participation in the electoral process among those groups most likely to vote for leftest candidates. With the added words we have an accurate statement that exposes Soros’ motives and agenda.
The Washington Free Beacon gives us some help adding some transparency to Soros’ alleged “openness.” Quoting from a 220-page Open Societies Foundation guide outlining its elections efforts, the Beacon informs us that,
“The following four goals form the scaffolding of U.S. Programs’ work,” the guide states. “1. An American democracy strengthened through increased meaningful participation, inclusive practice, and accountability.” The third strategic goal expands upon this, calling for “Full political, economic, and civic participation of immigrants and communities of color by dismantling the barriers and strengthening the conduits to opportunity.”
Lest there be any remaining doubt as to whether this election program has a leftest agenda, the Beacon tells us all we need to know about Soros’ real goal.
“The campaign’s leader is Marc Elias, a partner at the D.C-based law firm Perkins Coie and Hillary Clinton’s top campaign lawyer. Elias’ work on the legal project is separate from his work on the campaign, although Clinton supports the effort.”
So, while Mr. Soros’ would no doubt say he supports openness and equality, and that he wants to increase voter participation, it would seem that “some voters are more equal than others.”
The world would be a better place if he moved himself to a desert island with no communications with the outside world. He should never, ever have any influence of any kind on anyone else.