Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Good thing she’s black!
Why does anyone want a judge to “marry” them in the first place? She is doing those couples a HUGE favor! Do it the old fashion way: have 3 witnesses and put your names in the back of a Bible. You know, the old fashion way. Why would you give your life over to the government in the first place? Go read the definition of a license. sarah
That was abide by the law
Gape mouth Omni-Sexual Obama super freak!
That’s how f***ed up their reasoning is. This is a judge who purportedly studied the law? Sue the law school!
Take her job and put her and her girlfriend in jail!!
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm and you notice she didn’t go to jail go figure
She refuse to marrie streight one’s why isn’t she in jail.
It goes both ways.
And another one.