Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Stupid is as stupid does
put her in jail
Some advice to those who are commenting here. When you are p$#%&!@*ionate about a topic to the point of doing ZERO research before you post a reply you further the stereotypes that are a detriment to your cause. Simple fact, a judge is not obligated to issue marriage licenses, clerks are. Your definition of marriage and your religious beliefs hold no water with marriage rights now. But you are welcome to continue to whine, complain and attempt to propagate inaccurate info all over the net because people who you will never meet have gained equal rights that has ZERO impact on your life. Like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum the adults have pointed to the corner, your time out has begun.
Hahahahahaha. I hope the people vote for another black as president because this Obama has don’t a great job.
She’s not following the law? If not, why isn’t she in jail like Kim Davis?
Clerks do not take oaths
when is she headed to jail
double standard. lock up this beastly thing.
This has gotten so unreal.
She needs to be sued for discrimination just like the gays sue everyone else for discrimination and she should be put in jail as well for disobeying the law because it’s part of her job to officiate weddings and they jailed the Kentucky clerk for doing the same thing