Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Huh…..and this is ok? @[9370328:2048:Jeff Christman] @[100000609058607:2048:Mike DeHerrera]
Time for an impreachment
She is NOT required to marry anyone. She was elected as a Civil Court Judge. Marriage is up to her discretion, NOT required. She stopped marrying anyone in protest of her state not legalizing gay marriage. When it was p$#%&!@*ed, she resumed marriages. The first being a gay couple. Ha! LOVE WINS.
If this is true she should be fired
PUT HER IN JAIL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
put her in jail too
the partners or bride and groom take the happiness out of their own weddings (how stupid)…… minister A will not marry gay….get someone else..minister B will not marry straight….get someone else. ….what’s the big deal?…..do they really want to start their union with a minister that does not want to perform their marriage?
how cute is this ???????????????????? Dear God in heaven , save us from evil !
So I’ll go to another Judge. It’s that simple.
she is Black so nothing is going to be done to her