Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Of course not!! Makes perfect harmony sense to me. Good for one good for all.
That’s comical what’s it against her religion or something. Must be a interesting bible if you could even call it that
No!!! Que risa!!
yes you are right but we live in a communist country now because we the people have voted them into office and gave them the power to change America so who is to blame or at least partly to blame and only we the people can change it back if it is not to late may God forgive us for that
Well blow us all down and MOVE OVER Kim, you might have a cell mate.
Taylor you do the same.
if this true she should be jailed just like the clerk who refused to issue gay marriage licenses
licky lick
And so the drama continues. Having the state be signatory to marriage is a mistake.
This judge should be treated just like the lady Kim Davis as if she can refuse to marry straight couples this is a violation of their civil rights.