Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
What about those people in the cake business that didn’t have the right to refuse? How do these people get to be adults without someone smacking the$#%&!@*out of them?
Sure glad that she gets to decide what laws to follow and what laws to ignore, on her personal agenda.
And the contrary of straight is…
I would not want to get married by a$#%&!@*
Imagine that?
More DNC tolerance. What if a straight judge refuses to engage a gay couple in their unnatural union? Ask the biased ACLU!
Mickey, that is called “goo goo liberalism”
Good. She has no right.
Zac Correll well that’s original, the most idiotic person is the one who thinks their lame jokes are funny well everyone else thinks they’re dumb, I’m gonna assume ppl laugh at u and u think they laugh with u retard
shoot the fagot