Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Remove the judge. She had an oath but nowadays I know there’s no good no one gives a damn about us look at the Democratic marches party
Hypocritical. But then she is perverted.
time for the gallows for this clown
Because she’s GAY.
Moron
Damn clam Slammers
If it were the other way around she would be removed, it always one sided prejudice
Give her the rough time you gave the gal in Kentucky for not issuing gay marriage licenses.
Do your job or leave the bench.
No wonder she is gay. No m as n would want something that ugly.