Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
SICKO……………….FIRING IS TOO GOOD FOR HER
Fired
Fired jail
Scum-of-the-earth Arthur they want the right and they want the right to be able to be as ugly and choose what they want to do but if we refuse to sell them a cake then we destroy their business but if it just sits on her seat and refuses to marry a straight couple the actual marriage of a man and a woman the only true marriage they say no well we don’t ever acknowledge your marriage anyways God did not create man and man or woman and woman if so there would have been no thrill of sex there would have been no enjoyment men would have had children just a naturally way
Arrest the demon$#%&!@*!!
Fire her.
]
Oh but this is ok you people are really just one way your way or no way
Your gay why does this bother you?
Fire her for not doing her job!!!!