Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Nathaniel. You’re right, the federal government can’t create a law, and they didn’t. The Supreme Court is in place to make sure existing laws are cons$#%&!@*utional. They simply declared that the existing bans on same-sex marriage, set in place by certain state governments, were uncons$#%&!@*utional. Which they were. And using the judicial branch as a thumping stick to get their selfish ways? That’s the most ironic statement I’ve ever seen. Gays wanting the right to marry (which I remind you affects NO ONE BUT THEM) is selfish, but Christians using state government to deny rights to another group of people is not selfish at all. Get out of here.
Why isn’t she in jail? The clerk in Kentucky went to jail for her beliefs but all this judge wants to do is play games!!
i meant job. sorry
Good…she’s available to marry all the gay couples ready to marry!!! Put the word out!!
Impeach imprision
She lost mind or?
there’s defiantly a double standard in this country
All her marriages are illegal. …man and woman only period…
The twisted liberal double standard surfaces again
This article is inaccurate and out dated, from the truth.