Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Why did the state legislate the union of marriage between man and woman to begin with?
That’s a good thing …now the straight couple get to show gay couples how to handle this … JUST FIND ANOTHER JUDGE…THIS ONE DOESN’T DESERVE THE HONOR OF MARRYING YOU…!!!
This is great! If he/she/it just doesn’t want to marry straight people, then all the others have a place to go. This gives the other judges the right to choose, which all should have anyway. You just find the judge or minister who will marry whites or who will marry others and everyone is happy. 🙂
Why is she not in jail?
Messed up
Get rid of this Judge, ASAP and right now!!! This is hypocritical and wrong.. Period.
Gay marriages are being refused by people who see it as against their religion, this Judge is refusing out of vindictiveness, yet it is the religious people who are being attacked, ridiculed, and punished simply for following their beliefs. Meanwhile a vindictive judge gets to wield her form of justice, and without even caring or asking if the people support gay rights. Simply because other straight people have refused gay marriage these straight people who are unfortunate enough to come across her in their search for their unity get turned down. But see if she bothered to ask then she could get hit with discrimination for turning down those who held different religious beliefs, so the only way she can is to punish all straight people, and put it under an equality argument. This sickens me, and the fact that nothing is going to happen to her while Christians lose their home and businesses for following their beliefs makes me even sicker.
Wanna real reaction? Refuse divorces haha
Spot on, Clifton! Kim Davis was following the laws of the state, not the scotus’ decision, of which they had no jurisdiction!
Ok