Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
A gay person is a freak of nature at best
Mostly BS – Before SCOTUS legalized$#%&!@* the judge refused to marry ANY couples until she could marry ALL couples. I suppose this is a principled argument if your start from a worldview that embraces unnatural unions. “What therefore$#%&!@*hath joined together, let not God put asunder.” That’s their starting point.
Inclusive…….huh??
Give me a break.I’m soo tired of this BS
Special.
Vote her right off her the court and then sue her for disobeying her oath and laws!!!!!
Put her in Jail just like you did the White clerk
Put her in jail just like you did with the clerk. I hope the couple sues the robe right off her
What? they changed from QUEERS to Happy people.
I just wonder what other great decision she has made. ( sarcasm)