Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
But it’s ok cuz it’s Bush’s fault, you’re a racist and (only) black lives matter….
One person doesn’t follow the law on “moral” issues and they will all start. Shame
Greg, if Kentucky’s law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman and she refuses to allow marriage licenses to be issued to straight people, WHICH SHE DID, she is violating her State’s law.
My theory prevails … Some are sicker than others! And since she is a gay Judge they can’t put her in jail as they did Mrs Davis. Black and White don’t mix.
@[1581843464:2048:Felicia Marie]
opportunity to give them a lesson about marriage equality, OK this lizzie judge for one was using her gay lifestyle while being a sitting judge telling them she was giving them a lesson about marriage equality !! Now what makes her different from Kim Davis? Kim refused to sign a marriage license because of her believe in God and Gods word. and now shes in jail for it , now this gay judge does this because of her beliefs. So sick and tired of this c**p, that couple should sue her the state and who ever else is involved
Why is she not going to jail?
♡♡♡♡♡<3♡♡♡♡♡
Remove this useless judge, they need term limits of no more than 3 yrs
Exactly, Taylor. The Supreme Court also lifted the ban on interracial marriage in the 60’s. Nothing was rewritten.