Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Didn’t we just go through this when a clerk decided not to give marriage licenses to gay couples and what happened then. Oh but this is completely different because it’s a gay judge….give me a break with this double standard b******t
She suppose to be a judge not doing her job
Shouldn’t be such a thing as a gay judge. Twisted values fr and he start
What normal couple would want to be married by a freak like her. Why is she allowed to be a judge?
Well then she is refusing to follow the law fire her and put her in jail just like they did the white county clerk
more of Obamas$#%&!@*she should be bared thrown off the bench
Big deal, they elected her, deal with it !!!
If she ran a bakery she would be violating someone’s rights
Relieve this “gay” judge of her duties. It is plain that her belief comes ahead of the law. Frighin liberal scum.
Wasn’t that clerk in Kentucky or wherever it was fired for not providing licenses for gay couples? What’s the difference?