Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
And this is precisely why people did not want to allow gay rights so much power. Now they have it and this is what the ramifications look like. What’s next….more sure to follow
Difference is that the judge passed the duty on to another judge, which is legal. While Kim D refused totally and ordered her staff to follow suit.
Priests and ministers can refuse fat marriage
Throw that judge out
Isn’t that against the law?
How did such an ungodly blabla become judge? Spiritual wickedness in high places
What about tolerance?
Why she stay in that position turn on that nasty anti-social woman or man I don’t know
The judge story is 4 years old….
and the couple’s request was sent to another judge. The couple for married, no delay…. totally different than a clerk barring marriage certificates and ordering staff to do the same.
who would ask