Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
look into missouri, what is being passed
Unbelievable, the tolerant left.
if she was white, she would of already been locked up
I agree with Barry
Sue em like they do everything else
Well better sue the judge
4 year old story. A judge is allowed to pass on ceremonies, and she referred the couples to another judge. Completely legal.
Much different than the Kim Davis story issuing licenses, as she ordered her staff to disobey the law.
where the outrage ,we punish a baker for not baking a cake but she refuses to marry ..TOTAL BS
Your fired
My logic is asinine? Haha OK so judges are not held to a higher standard and can deny license marriages to straight people? Why didn’t the gay people just go to another clerk then? See the double standard?