Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Sounds like Kim Davis…..imagine that
Then she should not be a United States judge she or he whatever that is can go to Muslim countries ha ha ha
De bench her
Not right.
1. the couple ( in oregon ) who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple should get their $135,000 back from that same couple…
the business owners ( and every other bakery…) should have the right to say no to providing services for homosexual couples if it goes against their religious beliefs / tenets…
or…
this particular judge should be removed from the bench immediately if she refuses to marry straight couples
Ain’t our society great?
File charges and sue for discrimination
How about the Judge Mr Obama
Remove her
Now if can only get a gay baker to refuse service to a gay wedding!