Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
-Contempt of court / should be jailed /
What?
I am suing
Wtf
Lol good grief!
Sounds a little fishy.
Yeah,and I’m sure she got the judge position because she was qualified.
Shouldn’t she be fired? Oh yea I forgot govt officials can do whatever they want now a days even if it is breaking the law.
You’re right, Supreme Court can not p$#%&!@* a law, and they didn’t. The Supreme Court decides whether or not an existing law is cons$#%&!@*utional. They did not rewrite marriage law, they simply declared that the existing bans on same sex marriage were uncons$#%&!@*utional, and rightfully so.
She has no business being a judge, child molesters, nuts cant be judges……………………………