Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Go to the JP instead she just wants attention!
SERIOUSLY?!?!!! So, it’s okay for a gay judge, not directly related to any religion, to refuse to marry a straight couple, but it’s not okay for a priest preacher to marry a homosexual couple, as it goes against their religion. This doesn’t make any sort of logical sense!
bla bla bla, what did the Obama administration do while we were looking at this…
You have judges like this one who wants to make her own laws instead of upholding our constitution, that’s a big problem for this country.
GOOD she should be fined !
Lmao oh the hypocrisy of the LGBT.
agreed throw her sorry$#%&!@*out.
what a stupid person throw him out
I think some judges do Spencer
Fire the c**t