Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
No. Kim refused to uphold something that is still not a law in Kentucky. Supreme court cannot p$#%&!@* a law by themselves and this doesnt even come up for review till january.
She didnt obey an order that they did not have a right to give.
Why don’t we call it for what it is? The CORPORATE media.
It would be a shame to me and my GOD if she had to Marry me and my wife !
She’s just mad that no one wants to marry her, which is probably due to the fact that she has one of those faces that you just want to punch.
Lmao , and word has it she loves her dog to !
The law in Kentucky still says man and woman. Kim did not refuse to do her job. She refused an order they didnt have a right to give. The supreme court cannot p$#%&!@* a law by themselves. This doesnt even come up for review until January. They must have forgotten there are 3 branches of government in the USA.
Gee, partiality, ya think? A little racism thrown in there, too?
The judge on the other hand is a totaly different story.
She should be in jail.