Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Very good now we have someone who will only marry gays, and a lady in like Kentucky who refuses to marry gays. No need here to refute or justify either one they are doing what they strongly believe in. I am guessing this gets very little media attention unless they try to justify this one while condemning the woman refusing to marry gays, that I have a very big problem with.
… makes perfect sense in this world …
Now, I wonder what would happen to me on Monday when I went into work .. and refused to do my job …?
God will judge you
Ewww yuck! You can tell.
Ugly bitch
AND she’s getting away with that? How? Didn’t they FIRE the CHRISTIAN in Kentucky who wouldn’t issue marriage licenses to gay couples? THIS IS A JUDGE. IF CHRISTIAN BAKERS ARE FORCED TO MAKE WEDDING CAKES FOR GAY WEDDINGS OR RECEIVE A FINE HOW CAN SHE GET AWAY WITH NOT MARRYING HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES?
Recall this retard
She’s just jealous she isn’t normal.
Do your job!
Hate begets Hate..This what the Repubs said they wanted..