Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
So much for being unbiased in the administration of her duties, just like Ginsberg performing$#%&!@*marriage then not recuse herself from the$#%&!@*marriage case!
Why isn’t she in jail?
What’s the purpose of marring gay people anyway? God doesn’t recognize the marriage that’s all that counts.
Jurisprudence lol
Fred Davis – true, but when a so-called “judge” discriminates, it’s a CRIME. There really is no other way to put it.
Can’t count to ten but can sit on bench.
Lock her up ! hehe Then get called a Racist .
There you go. Haha open Pandora box and what pops out.
Who cares?
The lady ghat refused to issue gay marriage licenses also refused to issue ANY licenses.
This lady is guilty of discrimination and should be charged.