Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
now this flips everything –refusing to do your job even though that law never changed when you were inducted into office—you need to be kicked out!!—you cant say the same thing its totally differant and thats the trap you just fell into
I personally have no issue with it for any secular marriage. She has then set the precedence. (As I am sure there are other gay Justices that have done the same.) So you all know, by doing so: All Pries, pastors, Ministers, Rabbi’s or Mullah’s can also REFUSE to marry gays on the same ground. $#%&!@* for tat as they say.
They should be grateful. Go find a minister.
impeach her and throw her in jail
She is a judicial contrarian and will be removed from the bench if she tries that in cases that come before her in court. But, truthfully, performing wedding ceremonies is not a judicial duty — but an elective activity, which she is free to do or abstain from doing — so there isn’t much that can be done about it. It simply reflects poorly on her judicial temperament, insofar as she is discriminating.
Because issuing marriage certificates is a clerk’s duty, but performing wedding ceremonies is not a judicial duty.
What did you expect
Put her in jail. Isn’t that what they did to the Christian clerk?
Hypocrite!
Because she is probably eatting Michelle Obama out