Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Then she goes to jail
The face of a pervert… horrible.
I love this! It’s only fair. Separation of church and state. Separation of religion and careers. If you can’t perform your job if it conflicts with your choice of religion, either get a different job or choose a different religion. It’s so simple, we live in a country that supports freedom, of pretty much everything. So ultimately, it’s your choice to support your beliefs according to your religious views, but still abiding by the law of the country you choose to live in. If you can’t do both of the above fairly, then choose a different country to live in. See how good that works out for ya.
y isn t she in jail
Put her in jail for contempt of court and no doing her duties.
and we throw someone in jail who does the opposite. guess cause the picture portray she is black! Guess thats the golden color for this president!!!
Judy Simon Miller Hey idiot….learn how to read then do some research..before making a fool of yourself again
put her in jail now
She needs to go to jail.
She is black. Therefore she can committ no crime. Blacks are above the law.